Cybage and an anonymised marketplace: Ecommerce platform test automation case analysed

Verdict: what is checkable

The evidence grade (this site's label for how a case is sourced: primary with client or press confirmation, secondary when vendor-hosted only.) is secondary: the only source is the vendor's own page; of 4 metrics, 0 are verifiable yes, 0 partial and 4 no. [ev-1300]

Client profile as published

Client
a Leading Japanese Electronic Commerce and Online Retailing Company (the vendor's description; the vendor does not name the client)
Segment
Marketplace
Region
Japan
Channels
ecommerce and marketplace
Size indicators
serves 1.5 billion members across the world; Has 70+ businesses spanning e-commerce, travel, banking, marketing, and media

The client description and size indicators are quoted from the source; segment, region and channels are this site's classification. [ev-1300]

Systems in scope

  • Ecommerce platform: named in the title ("Electronic Commerce and Online Retailing Company") and the Business Impact section ("per marketplace per cycle"); platform not named

Where the source names each system is quoted or summarised from the case page. [ev-1300]

Problem as stated

The client is a Japanese ecommerce and online retail group with many businesses. It wanted to lower the cost of fixing defects and release faster. It also wanted QA run as a separate function with attention to the customer experience, including for elderly users. [ev-1300]

Executing independent QA activities focusing on customer experience. (quoted from the source)

Approach

Testing types
automation, api and functional (main scope: automation)
Team shape
not stated
Duration
not stated
Engagement model
not stated
Tooling named in the source
none named

Metrics claimed

Metrics as published, with who claims each and what this site could check.
MetricValueUnitClaimed byVerifiableEvidence
UI regression test time5 hrs. from 72 hrs.hoursvendornoev-1662
testing effort saved70+man days per marketplace per cyclevendornoev-1663
API tests executed dailyover 14000API tests executed dailyvendornoev-1664
release interval3 weeks from 2 monthsrelease intervalvendornoev-1665

What the case does not say

  • Measurement method.
  • Duration over which the metric held.
  • Team size on both sides.
  • Cost.
  • What was out of scope.
  • Whether the client is still a client.
  • Date of the work.

Reading notes for a buyer

This case speaks to the scenario “Peak-season readiness in 90 days” and feeds dimension D4 (Test automation evidence) of the methodology. A question to put to Cybage:

Which frameworks run the UI and API suites, and how was the cut in UI regression time measured? [ev-1300]

Source and verification

Source
Implemented a Multi-Layer Test Automation Solution for a Leading Japanese Electronic Commerce and Online Retailing Company | Cybage
Published
2024-03-20
Verified
2026-10-30
Evidence grade
secondary
Corroborating sources
none found
Evidence records for this case.
IdClaimSourceClassGradePublishedVerified
ev-1300Implemented a Multi-Layer Test Automation Solution for a Leading Japanese Electronic Commerce and Online Retailing CompanyImplemented a Multi-Layer Test Automation Solution for a Leading Japanese Electronic Commerce and Online Retailing Company | Cybagevendor-case-studysecondary2024-03-202026-10-30
ev-1662With automation, UI regression test time reduced to 5 hrs. from 72 hrs.Implemented a Multi-Layer Test Automation Solution for a Leading Japanese Electronic Commerce and Online Retailing Companyvendor-case-studysecondary2024-03-202026-10-30
ev-1663Saving 70+ man days for testing per marketplace per cycle.Implemented a Multi-Layer Test Automation Solution for a Leading Japanese Electronic Commerce and Online Retailing Companyvendor-case-studysecondary2024-03-202026-10-30
ev-1664Seamless API test automation (over 14000 tests executed daily).Implemented a Multi-Layer Test Automation Solution for a Leading Japanese Electronic Commerce and Online Retailing Companyvendor-case-studysecondary2024-03-202026-10-30
ev-1665More frequent releases (3 weeks from 2 months) with enhanced test coverage.Implemented a Multi-Layer Test Automation Solution for a Leading Japanese Electronic Commerce and Online Retailing Companyvendor-case-studysecondary2024-03-202026-10-30

Vendor profile: Cybage. System facet: Ecommerce platform testing vendors.

Positions on this page are computed from the methodology published at /methodology/ and from the evidence records linked on this page. Case study figures are the vendor's or the client's claims as published at the linked source; the "verifiable" column states what this site could check. The site does not recommend vendors, does not accept paid placement and does not publish rates. Last computed: 2026-11-03.

Published by the editor of retailqavendors.com. Last reviewed .