QATestLab and Camperdown Cellars: Magento functional testing case analysed
Verdict: what is checkable
The evidence grade (this site's label for how a case is sourced: primary with client or press confirmation, secondary when vendor-hosted only.) is secondary: the only source is the vendor's own page; of 1 metric, 0 are verifiable yes, 1 partial and 0 no. [ev-1194]
Client profile as published
- Client
- Camperdown Cellars
- Segment
- Specialty retail
- Region
- Australia
- Channels
- ecommerce
- Size indicators
- none given
The client description and size indicators are quoted from the source; segment, region and channels are this site's classification. [ev-1194]
Systems in scope
- Ecommerce platform (Magento): named in the body text and in the Benefits section
- Integrations (Microsoft Dynamics RMS): named in the body text ("Magento platform in Microsoft Dynamics RMS system integration")
Where the source names each system is quoted or summarised from the case page. [ev-1194]
Problem as stated
The online liquor store also offers party equipment rental, ice delivery, snacks and drink planning. It asked for manual functional testing, cross-browser testing of the design and regression testing. It also asked for testing of its Magento store integrated with Microsoft Dynamics RMS. The testers worked alongside the client's external development team. [ev-1194]
testing of the Magento platform in Microsoft Dynamics RMS system integration(quoted from the source)
Approach
- Testing types
- functional (main scope: functional)
- Team shape
- 2 testing engineers
- Duration
- 160 man-hours
- Engagement model
- not stated
- Tooling named in the source
- Jira, TargetProcess, HotGloo, Photoshop
Metrics claimed
| Metric | Value | Unit | Claimed by | Verifiable | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fixed bugs | Over 150 | bugs | vendor | partial | ev-1195 |
What the case does not say
- Baseline before the engagement.
- Measurement method.
- Cost.
- Whether the client is still a client.
- Date of the work.
Reading notes for a buyer
This case speaks to the scenario “First outsourced QA team for a mid-size retailer” and feeds dimension D2 (Retail system coverage) of the methodology. A question to put to QATestLab:
Which Magento to Dynamics RMS data flows did the integration test plan cover, and how many of the fixed bugs sat in that integration? [ev-1194]
Source and verification
- Source
- Australian Online Liquor Store Camperdown Cellars
- Published
- not dated by the vendor
- Verified
- 2026-10-30
- Evidence grade
- secondary
- Corroborating sources
- none found
| Id | Claim | Source | Class | Grade | Published | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ev-1194 | Australian Online Liquor Store Camperdown Cellars | Australian Online Liquor Store Camperdown Cellars | vendor-case-study | secondary | 2026-10-30 | |
| ev-1195 | Over 150 fixed bugs. | Australian Online Liquor Store Camperdown Cellars | vendor-case-study | secondary | 2026-10-30 |
Vendor profile: QATestLab. System facet: Ecommerce platform testing vendors.
Positions on this page are computed from the methodology published at /methodology/ and from the evidence records linked on this page. Case study figures are the vendor's or the client's claims as published at the linked source; the "verifiable" column states what this site could check. The site does not recommend vendors, does not accept paid placement and does not publish rates. Last computed: 2026-11-03.
Published by the editor of retailqavendors.com. Last reviewed .