QATestLab and JustBats.com, JustBallGloves.com: Ecommerce platform test automation case analysed
Verdict: what is checkable
The evidence grade (this site's label for how a case is sourced: primary with client or press confirmation, secondary when vendor-hosted only.) is secondary: the only source is the vendor's own page; the case publishes no metric, so nothing in it can be checked as a figure. [ev-1202]
Client profile as published
- Client
- JustBats.com, JustBallGloves.com
- Segment
- Specialty retail
- Region
- not stated in the source
- Channels
- ecommerce and mobile
- Size indicators
The online stores that specialize on sale of a wide range of baseball bats, balls and gloves.
The client description and size indicators are quoted from the source; segment, region and channels are this site's classification. [ev-1202]
Systems in scope
- Ecommerce platform: the stores JustBats.com and JustBallGloves.com are named in the Benefits section; no platform is named
- Mobile commerce: "JustBats.com / mobile" and "JustBallGloves.com / mobile" named in the Benefits section
Where the source names each system is quoted or summarised from the case page. [ev-1202]
Problem as stated
The online stores selling baseball bats, balls and gloves were growing and needed automated tests of basic functions to run regular regression on the desktop and mobile versions. Each failure had to come with a report listing the steps that led to the error and a screenshot. [ev-1202]
covering desktop and mobile versions(quoted from the source)
Approach
- Testing types
- automation and functional (main scope: automation)
- Team shape
- 2 automated test engineers
- Duration
- 60 man-hours
- Engagement model
- not stated
- Tooling named in the source
- Capybara, Cucumber, Selenium Web Driver
Metrics claimed
The case publishes no metric.
What the case does not say
- Baseline before the engagement.
- Cost.
- Whether the client is still a client.
- Date of the work.
Reading notes for a buyer
This case speaks to the scenario “First outsourced QA team for a mid-size retailer” and feeds dimension D4 (Test automation evidence) of the methodology. A question to put to QATestLab:
How many of the customer's test cases were automated, and who maintained the automated suite after handover? [ev-1202]
Source and verification
- Source
- Online Stores of Sporting Goods
- Published
- not dated by the vendor
- Verified
- 2026-10-30
- Evidence grade
- secondary
- Corroborating sources
- none found
| Id | Claim | Source | Class | Grade | Published | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ev-1202 | Online Stores of Sporting Goods | Online Stores of Sporting Goods | vendor-case-study | secondary | 2026-10-30 |
Vendor profile: QATestLab. System facet: Ecommerce platform testing vendors.
Positions on this page are computed from the methodology published at /methodology/ and from the evidence records linked on this page. Case study figures are the vendor's or the client's claims as published at the linked source; the "verifiable" column states what this site could check. The site does not recommend vendors, does not accept paid placement and does not publish rates. Last computed: 2026-11-03.
Published by the editor of retailqavendors.com. Last reviewed .