ScienceSoft and an anonymised omnichannel retailer: Magento functional testing case analysed

Verdict: what is checkable

The evidence grade (this site's label for how a case is sourced: primary with client or press confirmation, secondary when vendor-hosted only.) is secondary: the only source is the vendor's own page; of 9 metrics, 0 are verifiable yes, 0 partial and 9 no. [ev-1698]

Client profile as published

Client
a US-based multi-business corporation present in a variety of industries, including hospitality, retail (ecommerce and brick-and-mortar fashion stores), and wellness (the vendor's description; the vendor does not name the client)
Segment
Enterprise omnichannel
Region
United States
Channels
stores and ecommerce
Size indicators
multi-business corporation present in a variety of industries

The client description and size indicators are quoted from the source; segment, region and channels are this site's classification. [ev-1698]

Systems in scope

  • Ecommerce platform (Magento): named in the Challenge section (Magento-based ecommerce platform) and in the technologies list (Magento 2)
  • Integrations: named in the Solution section ("the platform’s integrations with such external systems as CMS, a PIM tool, a website payment and a POS (point of sale: the till software and hardware that rings up store sales, takes card payments and prints receipts.) system, a warehouse management tool, CRM, and a tax calculator")
  • POS: named in the Solution section as an integration of the ecommerce platform and as a source of customer data checked in CRM and DWH testing
  • Payments: named in the Solution section (website payment integration; "payment-transaction processes complied with PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard: the security rules for any business that stores, processes or transmits card data.)")

Where the source names each system is quoted or summarised from the case page. [ev-1698]

Problem as stated

The client's Magento store, a Dynamics 365 CRM for web and mobile, and an on-premises data warehouse were all still being built and customized. The client wanted one managed testing provider with Magento, Dynamics and data warehouse experience to check function, security and usability, and to confirm that new changes did not break existing features. [ev-1698]

Approach

Testing types
functional, performance, security and mobile (main scope: functional)
Team shape
six test engineers on the ecommerce platform, two test engineers on web and mobile CRM testing, one test engineer on the data warehouse; team size scaled up and down
Duration
not stated
Engagement model
managed-testing
Tooling named in the source
Magento Test Framework, Apache JMeter, Atlassian JIRA, Atlassian Confluence

Metrics claimed

Metrics as published, with who claims each and what this site could check.
MetricValueUnitClaimed byVerifiableEvidence
test engineers on the ecommerce platformsixtest engineersvendornoev-1699
test engineers on CRM testingtwotest engineersvendornoev-1700
user stories and test casesvendor claim, outside the typical range in this data set2,200user stories and test casesvendornoev-1701
access levels for brick-and-mortar stores8access levelsvendornoev-1702
access levels for hospitality employees7access levelsvendornoev-1702
access levels for wellness centers5access levelsvendornoev-1702
iOS devices in mobile testingthreeiOS devicesvendornoev-1703
Android devices in mobile testingtwoAndroid devicesvendornoev-1703
client records in DWH load check5,000+real client recordsvendornoev-1704

What the case does not say

  • Baseline before the engagement.
  • Measurement method.
  • Duration over which the metric held.
  • Cost.
  • What was out of scope.
  • Whether the client is still a client.
  • Date of the work.

Reading notes for a buyer

This case speaks to the scenario “Payments and PCI scope” and feeds dimension D2 (Retail system coverage) of the methodology. A question to put to ScienceSoft:

Which POS and payment integration scenarios did the team test end to end, and what did the PCI DSS check cover? [ev-1698]

Source and verification

Source
Managed Testing of an Ecommerce Solution, CRM and Data Warehouse for US Multi-Industry Corporation
Published
not dated by the vendor
Verified
2026-10-30
Evidence grade
secondary
Corroborating sources
none found
Evidence records for this case.
IdClaimSourceClassGradePublishedVerified
ev-1698Managed Testing of an Ecommerce Solution, CRM and Data Warehouse for US Multi-Industry CorporationManaged Testing of an Ecommerce Solution, CRM and Data Warehouse for US Multi-Industry Corporationvendor-case-studysecondary2026-10-30
ev-1699A group of six test engineers got down to testing as soon as the development process of the e-commerce platform started.Managed Testing of an Ecommerce Solution, CRM and Data Warehouse for US Multi-Industry Corporationvendor-case-studysecondary2026-10-30
ev-1700Thus, two ScienceSoft’s test engineers paid special attention to functionality, performance, usability testing and role-based access control validation during web and mobile CRM testing.Managed Testing of an Ecommerce Solution, CRM and Data Warehouse for US Multi-Industry Corporationvendor-case-studysecondary2026-10-30
ev-1701With a significant number of different user stories and test cases (2,200) to implement for retail, hospitality and wellness employees, functionality testing took the majority of the testing time.Managed Testing of an Ecommerce Solution, CRM and Data Warehouse for US Multi-Industry Corporationvendor-case-studysecondary2026-10-30
ev-1702To manage this process, the test team created a roles matrix: for brick-and-mortar stores, 8 access levels were assigned, for hospitality employees, 7 levels, and for wellness centers, 5.Managed Testing of an Ecommerce Solution, CRM and Data Warehouse for US Multi-Industry Corporationvendor-case-studysecondary2026-10-30
ev-1703The mobile app was tested on three iOS devices of different versions and two Android devices.Managed Testing of an Ecommerce Solution, CRM and Data Warehouse for US Multi-Industry Corporationvendor-case-studysecondary2026-10-30
ev-1704The test team also checked the DWH load limits, as it had to cope with the large volume of data (5,000+ real client records) and the maximum number of users that access the DWH through the e-commerce platform and CRM simultaneously.Managed Testing of an Ecommerce Solution, CRM and Data Warehouse for US Multi-Industry Corporationvendor-case-studysecondary2026-10-30

Vendor profile: ScienceSoft. System facet: Ecommerce platform testing vendors.

Positions on this page are computed from the methodology published at /methodology/ and from the evidence records linked on this page. Case study figures are the vendor's or the client's claims as published at the linked source; the "verifiable" column states what this site could check. The site does not recommend vendors, does not accept paid placement and does not publish rates. Last computed: 2026-11-03.

Published by the editor of retailqavendors.com. Last reviewed .